Claude

Every other destination is somewhere Meetext installs into. Claude is the opposite: it connects inward, over the public internet, to an endpoint that already exists. What makes it a deployment is not the protocol but everything around it.

MeetextMeetextDestination network Live
One productevery customer workspace
ClaudeChatGPTAtlassianGoogle ChatHubSpotMicrosoft 365SalesforceServiceNowSlack
Customer scopedLeast privilegeContinuously checked

Available today

The adapter is real and something is incomplete, either a part of the destination or real-provider proof for part of the lifecycle. The gap is stated on the page rather than discovered during an evaluation.

The adapter is complete and every path is covered by tests against a provider simulator, which proves our logic and not the provider's. Not yet exercised with real provider credentials: authorization, installation, execution, refresh and reconnect, validation, failure handling.

How installation normally works

What a forward deployed engineer does by hand today.

No install and no redirect. The customer receives a server URL and a token on their installation page and adds a custom connector in Claude.

Who has to approve it

The person whose calendar decides your go-live date.

A workspace owner or administrator, since a connector is available to the people they choose.

Identity and OAuth model

Whose identity the product acts as, and where that grant lives.

A token Meetext issues for this environment alone. There is no third-party grant, because there is no third party.

What Meetext owns

The repeatable half, turned into software.

The hosted MCP endpoint, the per-customer token, the frozen package that decides which capabilities that token can reach, and revocation.

What the customer owns

The half that is theirs and should stay theirs.

Their Claude workspace, and who inside it can use the connector.

Capability and permission model

How capabilities map onto what the platform will let you do.

Not provider scopes. The token reaches exactly the capabilities this customer is entitled to at the version approved for them, and nothing else the vendor has published.

Validation

What has to execute before anyone is told it works.

The connector proves itself by connecting. A request arriving with this environment's token is the only evidence anybody finished the setup, so nothing is marked connected before it happens.

Credential lifecycle

Rotation, expiry, revocation, and who notices first.

One token per environment, rotatable. Rotating it disconnects this customer's connector and no other.

Deployment versioning

What happens to this customer when you ship version four.

Nike stays on the package approved for Nike when the vendor publishes a new version. A hosting platform has one server at one version; this is one customer's installation of it.

Typical failure modes

What actually goes wrong, named rather than generalised.

An endpoint that is not publicly reachable, which fails silently: the customer pastes it, Claude reports a connection error, and nothing on this side hears about it. Refused at publish rather than discovered later.

Operational monitoring

How you learn it broke without the customer telling you.

Whether the token is issued and the endpoint is a public address Claude could reach, plus whether it has ever actually connected.

Common questions

Does Meetext support Claude?
Claude support is in preview. The adapter is complete and every path is covered by tests against a provider simulator, which proves our logic and not the provider's. Not yet exercised with real provider credentials: authorization, installation, execution, refresh and reconnect, validation, failure handling. Meetext does not yet operate production Claude customer deployments.
Who has to approve a Claude installation?
A workspace owner or administrator, since a connector is available to the people they choose.
What goes wrong with Claude deployments?
An endpoint that is not publicly reachable, which fails silently: the customer pastes it, Claude reports a connection error, and nothing on this side hears about it. Refused at publish rather than discovered later.

Current support status

PreviewClaude

The adapter is real and something is incomplete, either a part of the destination or real-provider proof for part of the lifecycle. The gap is stated on the page rather than discovered during an evaluation.

The adapter is complete and every path is covered by tests against a provider simulator, which proves our logic and not the provider's. Not yet exercised with real provider credentials: authorization, installation, execution, refresh and reconnect, validation, failure handling.

Implementation
A complete adapter.
Proof
Covered end to end against a provider simulator. Never run against the real provider.

Lifecycle coverage

  • authorization · simulated
  • execution · simulated
  • failure handling · simulated
  • installation · simulated
  • refresh and reconnect · simulated
  • validation · simulated

This label is generated from a proof registry in the deployment code, not written on this page. Available requires a complete adapter and either dated real-provider evidence or an explicit owner attestation after simulator-complete testing. The proof row above keeps those foundations apart.

2 environments free

Stop assigning an engineer to every customer.

Connect a source, publish, and send one link. Your next enterprise customer installs itself.

2 customer environments free, forever. No card required.